ვიკიპედია:კენჭისყრის პოლიტიკა

ვიკიპედია არ არის დემოკრატიის ცდა. მისი კონსენსუსის პოვნის ძირითადი მეთოდია დისკუსია და არა კენჭისყრა. რთულ შემთხვევებში შესაძლებელია პირდაპირი აზრთა გამოკითხვის ჩატარება კონსენსუსის გასარკვევად, თუმცა მას სიფრთხილით უნდა მოვეკიდოთ და არავითარ შემთხვევაში არ მივიჩნიოთ ისინი როგორც კანონი.

ზოგიერთ შემთხვევაში სასარგებლოა სტატისტიკური გამოკითხვის ჩატარება გარკვეულ საკითხებზე, რაც დამხმარე საშუალებაა კონსენსუსის მისაღწევად და იმის გასარკვევად თუ რომელ მოსაზრებას აქვს ყველაზე დიდი მხარდაჭერა.

იხილეთ ვიკიპედია:კენჭისყრა მიმდინარე დისკუსიებისა და გამოკითხვის სიისთვის.

Creating a survey

These guidelines provide a framework that may be followed when creating a new survey. These are not binding in any way.

1. Any Wikipedian may start a survey on any topic, but attempts to reach consensus are much, much, MUCH preferred, and should perhaps be followed even when it pains us most.
2. Consensus must be reached about the nature of the survey before it starts. Allow about a week for this process.
3. In general, surveys are to help gauge the degree of consensus on an issue, such as whether a particular article version appears to be POV or NPOV. Surveys should not be used for the purposes of "fact finding."
4. A deadline for the survey should be considered so as to resolve the issue in a timely manner.
5. Once started, the questions and wording in the survey should not change. However, if someone feels that the existing survey is seriously flawed, this is typically an indication Step 2 was not completed properly.
6. If the majority of opinion is in one direction, but a significant minority of people oppose it, work to find a solution that can be accepted by as many people as possible.

Survey etiquette

If you are posting on talk pages, asking experienced editors to give their opinion on an issue, make sure not to use language that may suggest bias.

Good: "Hey, Bob, could you tell me what you think about this discussion? I think your input could help"

Bad: "Yet another attempt to push POV-- please help!"

Sample survey

Note that this is purely a sample of one way to organise such a survey—different circumstances may call for different approaches.

Please sign your name using four tildes (~~~~) under the position you support, preferably adding a brief comment. If you are happy with more than one possibility, you may wish to sign your names to more than one place. Extended commentary should be placed below, in the section marked "Discussion", though brief commentary can be interspersed.

• Use BCE and CE for years
  • Alice Springs
  • EfferVescent
  • NotARealUser
• Use AD and BC for years
  • FictionalName
  • Fred Bloggs -- but redirect from BCE and CE (first choice)
  • This is always how we did it in school. -- MadeUp
  • Why go against the (main)stream? user:Zanimum
• Allow both as equally acceptable alternatives
  • It's the wiki way! OnTheFence
  • Fred Bloggs (second choice)

Discussion

Discussion resulting from the survey would go here. If there were a significant amount, it might be moved to a talk page instead.

---

See also

• Voting is good, Voting is evil (courtesy MeatballWiki)
• Wikipedia:Consensus
• Wikipedia:Supermajority
• Wikipedia:How to hold a consensus vote (rejected proposal, kept for historical purposes only)